Once again, I’d like to highlight a post from Palmdoc in the Malaysian Medical Resources. This time, it’s about the Health Ministry’s plan to bring in Traditional Chinese Medicine to government hospitals. You HAVE to read this article. It’s MANDATORY reading for all. OK lah.. if you have any interest in healthcare, then you might like to read it.
My opinion is: i don’t think that anyone can prove or disprove a “system” of medicine. However, the practitioners of traditional chinese medicine should take it upon themselves to:
- demonstrate the scientific basis of the practice of herbology or acupuncture etc. Otherwise how can one claim that there is a “system” at all? Are all practitioners talking about the same thing when they mention a particular term?
- identify the actual components of herbs that are responsible for the action of the herb and identify the species that is actually used. Otherwise who would know whether “ginkgo” used here and “ginkgo” used there are one and the same type? What I am talking about here is “standardization”.
- prove that the materials and methods used have an effect above and beyond a placebo effect.
- organise themselves into a body to regulate themselves and their practice. I don’t buy the claim that, “It’s a family secret.” There should be transparency and accountability when people are expected submit themselves to practitioners for medical care.
No matter whether a “system” of medicine is efficacious or not, the consumer has a right to choose. The consumer, however, has the right to protection from ignorance (on the part of the practitioner, not the patient) and quackery.