<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this cancer?</title>
	<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/</link>
	<description>What's next along this river of life?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-644</link>
		<author>Bernard</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>HQ, i would refrain from giving specific advice for specific patients. As a general rule, however, all lumps should be assessed in three ways:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;clinically, by history and examination.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;radiologically, i.e. an imaging method, either by mammography or ultrasound.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;pathologically, by needle or excisional biopsy.
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;
An assessment based on all three aspects together would be 99% accurate.

Noteworthy points, however, are that:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The presence or absence of pain does not help to differentiate between cancer and benign lump.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Small lumps may be just part of a "lumpy" breast. A biopsy would be the way to go if there really is a discrete lump instead of a "lumpy" breast. Otherwise, a  "watch and see" policy may be adopted. Either way, steps 1 and 2 should be taken as well.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
I hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HQ, i would refrain from giving specific advice for specific patients. As a general rule, however, all lumps should be assessed in three ways:</p>
<ol>
<li>clinically, by history and examination.
</li>
<li>radiologically, i.e. an imaging method, either by mammography or ultrasound.
</li>
<li>pathologically, by needle or excisional biopsy.
</li>
</ol>
<p>An assessment based on all three aspects together would be 99% accurate.</p>
<p>Noteworthy points, however, are that:</p>
<ol>
<li>The presence or absence of pain does not help to differentiate between cancer and benign lump.</li>
<li>Small lumps may be just part of a &#8220;lumpy&#8221; breast. A biopsy would be the way to go if there really is a discrete lump instead of a &#8220;lumpy&#8221; breast. Otherwise, a  &#8220;watch and see&#8221; policy may be adopted. Either way, steps 1 and 2 should be taken as well.</li>
</ol>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hijackqueen</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-620</link>
		<author>Hijackqueen</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-620</guid>
		<description>My sister had something like a lump in her breast too.  Can't remember the scientific name.  She said it is like the size of kidney bean.  Doc just ask her to hold on.  Lately she felt some pain and doc said it's the muscle that is pressing against the lump.  The lump is there for about a year plus now.  Do you think we should wait longer for the worst to come?  Oh, doc said it's not cancerous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sister had something like a lump in her breast too.  Can&#8217;t remember the scientific name.  She said it is like the size of kidney bean.  Doc just ask her to hold on.  Lately she felt some pain and doc said it&#8217;s the muscle that is pressing against the lump.  The lump is there for about a year plus now.  Do you think we should wait longer for the worst to come?  Oh, doc said it&#8217;s not cancerous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-614</link>
		<author>Bernard</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-614</guid>
		<description>The results of the pathology is back... it's giant fibroadenoma. That's benign. Good for her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results of the pathology is back&#8230; it&#8217;s giant fibroadenoma. That&#8217;s benign. Good for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-573</link>
		<author>Bernard</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I don't think she can remember the original shape before the lump appeared. But.. it's fairly balanced when compared the other side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think she can remember the original shape before the lump appeared. But.. it&#8217;s fairly balanced when compared the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoiling</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-565</link>
		<author>hoiling</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 04:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-565</guid>
		<description>Err .. the breast size back to original shape after the procedure??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err .. the breast size back to original shape after the procedure??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-552</link>
		<author>Bernard</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>Sifu George, thank you for your wise answers to my humble question. I agree with the possibilities. 

Re: I perform FNAC (Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, for the uninitiated) or core needle biopsy in 2 situations:
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It would be useful if the lesion was &lt;em&gt;suspicious&lt;/em&gt; of malignancy/cancer to avoid an excisional biopsy just as I had performed in this patient before a proper cancer-clearing operation.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If the patient wanted to &lt;em&gt;keep&lt;/em&gt; the tumour (as some patients might be undecided about removing it) then FNAC would be useful to rule out a cancer and the patient may be allowed to keep it under watchful eyes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
This young lady's tumour was clinically benign and she was not thinking of keeping it anymore because of the ache caused by the weight. So, excision of the tumour was performed as the first procedure. This &lt;em&gt;avoids&lt;/em&gt; an FNAC, the discomfort and the cost, which &lt;em&gt;has&lt;/em&gt; to be calculated in private practice. 

Good reason, sifu? Any comments about that ah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sifu George, thank you for your wise answers to my humble question. I agree with the possibilities. </p>
<p>Re: I perform FNAC (Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, for the uninitiated) or core needle biopsy in 2 situations:</p>
<ol>
<li>It would be useful if the lesion was <em>suspicious</em> of malignancy/cancer to avoid an excisional biopsy just as I had performed in this patient before a proper cancer-clearing operation.</li>
<li>If the patient wanted to <em>keep</em> the tumour (as some patients might be undecided about removing it) then FNAC would be useful to rule out a cancer and the patient may be allowed to keep it under watchful eyes.</li>
</ol>
<p>This young lady&#8217;s tumour was clinically benign and she was not thinking of keeping it anymore because of the ache caused by the weight. So, excision of the tumour was performed as the first procedure. This <em>avoids</em> an FNAC, the discomfort and the cost, which <em>has</em> to be calculated in private practice. </p>
<p>Good reason, sifu? Any comments about that ah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-550</link>
		<author>George</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Well here is what sifu uncle George thinks (like it is important)

- 2 possibilities:
          1. Fibroadenoma
          2. Phylloides tumour

- how come no FNAC? Sorry to ask</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here is what sifu uncle George thinks (like it is important)</p>
<p>- 2 possibilities:<br />
          1. Fibroadenoma<br />
          2. Phylloides tumour</p>
<p>- how come no FNAC? Sorry to ask</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-547</link>
		<author>Bernard</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-547</guid>
		<description>guys and girls, a few things argue for benign disease... 

... she's young, but young women with breast cancer is not unknown.

... it's been there a long time, but some less aggressive cancers can be there for quite some time too. 

... it's looks well demarcated and encapsulated. That's because I cut it without taking a margin of normal breast. Because I think the probability of cancer is low too.

I'm waiting for the pathological examination report, but I'm quite sure it's a benign giant fibroadenoma.

A gentle giant of sorts. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guys and girls, a few things argue for benign disease&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230; she&#8217;s young, but young women with breast cancer is not unknown.</p>
<p>&#8230; it&#8217;s been there a long time, but some less aggressive cancers can be there for quite some time too. </p>
<p>&#8230; it&#8217;s looks well demarcated and encapsulated. That&#8217;s because I cut it without taking a margin of normal breast. Because I think the probability of cancer is low too.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the pathological examination report, but I&#8217;m quite sure it&#8217;s a benign giant fibroadenoma.</p>
<p>A gentle giant of sorts. <img src='http://bernardchan.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yenjai</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-543</link>
		<author>yenjai</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Oct 2006 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-543</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with CSH.
Nice demarcation. No break in the capsule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with CSH.<br />
Nice demarcation. No break in the capsule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoiling</title>
		<link>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-536</link>
		<author>hoiling</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://bernardchan.net/2006/10/20/is-this-cancer/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Oh my! .. Those "thingss" taken from 1 side of the breast? I wonder she having lopsided size for 2 years? Feel sorry for her. So young. 

The tumor (am I correct to refer it as tumor?) grown to this size for 2 years and she still alive, my take would be benign. If its cancerous, I think she might be in critical condition, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my! .. Those &#8220;thingss&#8221; taken from 1 side of the breast? I wonder she having lopsided size for 2 years? Feel sorry for her. So young. </p>
<p>The tumor (am I correct to refer it as tumor?) grown to this size for 2 years and she still alive, my take would be benign. If its cancerous, I think she might be in critical condition, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
